After the boom of globalization
phenomenon exploded, the mobility of people movement has since remarkably and rapidly
spread out over the world. People have then moved from here to there, at the
same time back and forth, seeking for fortune elsewhere particularly from
poorer, less developed country to richer and more developed country. The world
seems to be borderless.
In this case, we may see the
arrival of thousands of migrant workers notably from Burma
constantly crossing border, from day to day, to Thailand by legal or illegal way to
reach their destination as evidence to this movement. They temporarily, in fact
most of them stay pretty long, some are reported years, settle in Thailand
looking for a job, a job of which they have thought before their arrival, would
be better than what they once had in their own country. Unfortunately, most of
those migrant workers, owing to their education and skill, only find a job, usually
in physical sectors: construction, agriculture, food industries, and end up with
unequal payment and exploitation.
According to MAP Foundation (Migrant Movements, 1996-2010)
those migrant workers are paid lower than minimum wage set by Thai government.
Yet, there are limited actions done by the government towards the employers who
own factories, companies, or restaurants. At the same time, those business
owners reportedly intend to recruit workers who come to Thailand
illegally for those workers would not mind working in hard condition with the
exchange of completely low payment. Should they mind complaining about income
inequality? Should they have rights to complaint even they are illegal migrant
workers? Or should they just keep silent and receive whatever their employers
provide them?
Even they are “illegal” migrant workers;
their hard work helps generate a lot of profit for business owner. Without
them, I may say, those business owners would barely gain more income! Those
capitalists see them small and vulnerable. If they dare to complaint about
income inequality, they would be threatened by reporting to the police of their
illegal status. In this situation, they have to shut their mouth, otherwise
they would be deported back home, and accept the small amount of payment –
maybe “little” is better than “nothing,” though their earning hardly secures
three meals on the table. They live day by day, hour by hour.
The
rich 16% capture 80% of the world resources, while the poor 84% remain only the
rest 20% of the world resources (World Bank). Would the rich mind about the
income inequality? Should the poor be shared a suitable proportion of their
labor to live in a suitable condition as a human being?! Who should care for
them? Themselves? The state? Or the rich?!
No comments:
Post a Comment