my favourite sentences...


You can hide memory, but you can't erase the history that produced them.

It was sad to see what used to be so fundamental to our lives fade away and disappear in front of our own eyes.

Words don't come out when you're deeply hurt. That's why people keep silent and give no explanation. Yet, Murakami once wrote in his novel, 1Q84, "If you can't understand without an explanation, you can't understand with an explanation." Sometimes, people tend to not wanting to understand things instead of wanting to understand things. In short, they tend to ignore the possibility of trying to understand things.

do you know what makes life interesting?
--> it's interesting because we don't know what the future holds for us. don't blame the fate. we decide our fate, it's our choice. we can't choose where to be born, but we can certainly choose the way we live our life...

the life is yours, why bother asking other people to paint it for you?...

when we're small our word has never been counted; when we're big every word has always been counted...

i may not be able to wait thirteen months for you, nor until you are twenty-five, but i can wait for you a lifetime -- Under the Hawthorn Tree by Ai Mi

waiting, though one minute, it's still unbearable...

death doesn't mean that we are no longer existing. death just means a move to another world...

why can parents wholeheartedly sacrifice everything for the happiness of their children, even their life? but why can't their children, whom they give birth to, do the same thing to them? what power is it that encourages them to do so?....

the thing i'm most afraid of is ME. of not knowing what i'm going to do. of not knowing what i'm doing right now.

people always meet new friends. but they should not forget their old friends. because without your old friends we don't have a chance to meet new friends. the memories with our friends will be there forever in our brain. we can't omit it though time passes.

Friday, May 2, 2014

The Poor or The Rich: Who should worry about income inequality?

After the boom of globalization phenomenon exploded, the mobility of people movement has since remarkably and rapidly spread out over the world. People have then moved from here to there, at the same time back and forth, seeking for fortune elsewhere particularly from poorer, less developed country to richer and more developed country. The world seems to be borderless.

In this case, we may see the arrival of thousands of migrant workers notably from Burma constantly crossing border, from day to day, to Thailand by legal or illegal way to reach their destination as evidence to this movement. They temporarily, in fact most of them stay pretty long, some are reported years, settle in Thailand looking for a job, a job of which they have thought before their arrival, would be better than what they once had in their own country. Unfortunately, most of those migrant workers, owing to their education and skill, only find a job, usually in physical sectors: construction, agriculture, food industries, and end up with unequal payment and exploitation.

According to MAP Foundation (Migrant Movements, 1996-2010) those migrant workers are paid lower than minimum wage set by Thai government. Yet, there are limited actions done by the government towards the employers who own factories, companies, or restaurants. At the same time, those business owners reportedly intend to recruit workers who come to Thailand illegally for those workers would not mind working in hard condition with the exchange of completely low payment. Should they mind complaining about income inequality? Should they have rights to complaint even they are illegal migrant workers? Or should they just keep silent and receive whatever their employers provide them?

Even they are “illegal” migrant workers; their hard work helps generate a lot of profit for business owner. Without them, I may say, those business owners would barely gain more income! Those capitalists see them small and vulnerable. If they dare to complaint about income inequality, they would be threatened by reporting to the police of their illegal status. In this situation, they have to shut their mouth, otherwise they would be deported back home, and accept the small amount of payment – maybe “little” is better than “nothing,” though their earning hardly secures three meals on the table. They live day by day, hour by hour.

The rich 16% capture 80% of the world resources, while the poor 84% remain only the rest 20% of the world resources (World Bank). Would the rich mind about the income inequality? Should the poor be shared a suitable proportion of their labor to live in a suitable condition as a human being?! Who should care for them? Themselves? The state? Or the rich?!

No comments:

Post a Comment